m038andClaude Opus 5
7c9c140a1b
main advanced 13 commits while this documentation audit ran — the location-override work was merged into the outer repo — and it independently fixed two of the audit's findings. Without this merge the branch would have REVERTED them, which is the worst outcome for a cleanup pass because it arrives disguised as an improvement. Both conflicts resolved in main's favour; main's wording was better informed: - CLAUDE.md, the single-map-path rule: main's carve-out (829325c) states the exception as its own top-level bullet, names MAP_STYLE as the one shared thing, and spells out both prohibitions ("do not fold it into initEntryMap", "do not add a third path"). Taken verbatim over the version drafted here. - 2026-07-23-post-form-location-override.md: main (a517331) had already set the status to Complete, with far richer detail — the multi-agent review findings, the green-run numbers, the DEL4 regression still open, and the merge SHAs. Taken in full; the audit's claim that the status "lagged" was dropped, since it was true only of this branch's older branch point. Submodule pin: main bumped user/ to dd19995 and this merge preserves that. The audit's own no-gitlink-commit discipline applies to bumping the pin as a side effect of routine work, not to discarding a bump main already made. main touched none of the other nine corrected documents, so the remaining 18 findings stand unchanged. Audit notes corrected to match reality rather than left overstated: - superseded-decisions.md R13 now dates the carve-out to 2026-07-24 (829325c) rather than implying this pass introduced it. - The reconciliation spec gains an "audit baseline moved twice" section: the submodule pin lagged real HEAD, and then the base branch advanced mid-audit. - The compounded learning's section 6 is rewritten from "audit the current state" to "re-check the baseline before publishing, not only before starting", with the two habits that actually follow: merge the base branch in before opening the PR and read conflicts as findings, and when the incoming version is better, take it wholesale. An audit has no special authority over the work it audits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/
If you're Mischa
Doing something operational? → guides/
- Posting a journal entry
- Managing GPX files
- Switching to a new trip
- Rebuilding local dev from scratch
Checking project status? → working/ — what's in there + the plan status convention
Design or architecture decisions? → reference/
- Design system
- Architecture overview — the site as it actually is
- Superseded decisions — what was planned, then reversed, and why
- Testing
Documents under
working/are historical records. If one describes something that no longer exists,reference/superseded-decisions.mdsays what replaced it.
If you're Claude
Always-loaded project rules → CLAUDE.md (repo root)
Active specs and plans → working/specs/ and working/plans/
Stable facts → reference/
Raw research input → research/