Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
m038andClaude Opus 5 086c36d157 docs(working): handover for the documentation reconciliation
Two-part handover following the repo's existing convention: Part A for a fresh
Claude session, Part B for the owner.

Part A leads with the trap rather than the deliverables, because it is the thing
most likely to cause damage: main advanced 13 commits mid-audit and had already
fixed two of the audit's findings, so this branch would have reverted them
without the merge. Includes the fetch-and-merge commands to re-check the baseline
if main has moved again overnight.

Also records, so a future session does not undo them:

- The tense split — past-tense records are annotated, never rewritten. "Finishing
  the job" by rewriting the milestone docs or the 41 completed plans is the wrong
  instinct and destroys the audit trail.
- One finding was WITHDRAWN during the audit (the asset table lists esbuild entry
  points, so imported-only sources are correctly absent). Adding them back would
  reintroduce a non-defect.
- The known false-positive link-check hit inside a ```diff fence.
- The submodule invariant: git diff main..HEAD -- user must stay empty. An earlier
  git reset -- user here silently reverted main's pin bump; that was caught, and
  the check is written down so it is not re-broken.
- P5's booby trap: removing shortcode-gallery-plusplus may take shortcode-core
  with it and break stories.

Part B is the two things only the owner can do: one command to open the PR (tea
needs an interactive TTY), and the 7 recommendation decisions with why each needs
a human. Notes that the PR body file lives in a Claude job dir and is
reconstructable from the spec if it has been cleaned up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-25 01:10:38 +02:00
m038andClaude Opus 4.8 44c3a1c32e docs(handover): mark photo-editor Playwright handover complete/superseded
Coverage goal delivered and verified (39 post specs pass on :8091);
superseded by 2026-07-07-journal-post-form-review-handover-and-qa.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Mpdu3Dt1iVoozHwAMyjrbn
2026-07-07 23:07:27 +02:00
m038andClaude Opus 4.8 06f4c25631 docs(handover): review handover + owner QA checklist; mark edit-plan review-complete
Add a review handover (Claude→future Claude: branch state, commit map,
dual-session isolation facts, and the owner-triggered landing procedure) plus
an owner UI QA checklist for the flows the harness can't verify (touch-drag,
interactive photo add/delete/reorder). Update the frontend-entry-edit plan
status: implementation + code-review done; only owner QA + landing remain.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Mpdu3Dt1iVoozHwAMyjrbn
2026-07-07 09:12:01 +02:00